The problems of public-law regulation of traditional institutions of democracy by E-technologies

Introduction. With the development of digital technologies in modern society, there is a significant evolution of democratic processes. Electronic technologies represent both new opportunities for citizens to participate in public administration and serious threats to the stability of traditional democratic institutions.

Purpose. Analysis of the problems of public law regulation of traditional democratic institutions in the context of the use of electronic technologies. In particular, the paper examines the impact of digital technologies on electoral processes and their dual role – both as an opportunity to increase citizen participation in governance and as a threat to the stability of democratic institutions.

Materials and methods. The study uses a variety of methods, including dialectical, system-structural and sociological approaches. The main materials of the study are actual legislative acts, analyses of electoral processes and data on the functioning of electronic platforms, such as the Unified Portal of State Services (UPSU), Digital voting station, «Mobile Voter», «InformUIK», remote electronic voting (REV) systems, etc. The empirical base includes statistical data on the functioning of electronic platforms, such as the Unified Portal of State Services (UPSU), «Mobile Voter», «InformUIK», remote electronic voting (REV) systems and others. The empirical base includes statistical data of the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation and scientific publications in the field of electoral law.

Results. The article shows that electronic technologies in the electoral process can both improve the accessibility of voting and raise serious concerns about the security and transparency of elections. Examples of successful use of digital services, such as Mobile Voter, which has greatly simplified the voting process, and the use of PPGU to collect candidate signatures are discussed. However, existing shortcomings are also identified, including uneven development of services and high risks of data manipulation.

Conclusions. Further digital transformation of the electoral process can increase the efficiency and transparency of elections. However, an important aspect remains the need to adhere to traditional voting methods to ensure accessibility for all citizens. To successfully regulate e-democracy, the State should develop measures aimed at increasing trust in digital services and minimizing the risks of unauthorized access to data. It is necessary to intensify public discussion and the legal consolidation of new technologies in the electoral process.

1. Vershinin A. I. Problems and prospects of legal regulation of digitalization of the electoral process. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Law. 2023;4(55):40–49. (In Russ.)

2. Vaishnarovich G.V. On providing the possibility of collecting voter signatures in elections to public authorities of the subject of the Russian Federation using the unified portal of state and municipal services (functions) in the legislation of the subjects of the Russian Federation. In: Urals Forum of Constitutionalists: materials of the Sixth Urals Forum of Constitutionalists (05-11 October 2020): in 2 parts. Ekaterinburg. Р. 2. 2021:9–14. (In Russ.)

3. Subochev I. A. Development of the institution of collecting voter signatures in the conditions of digitalization of the electoral process. In: New reality of the modern world: challenges and prospects: proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (03-04 February 2021), Barnaul; 2020:80–85. (In Russ.)

4. Salikhov D. R. Protest relations in constitutional law: from theory to practice of constitutional legal regulation: a monograph. Мoscow; 2022. 208 р. (In Russ.)

5. Ulikhin V. С. How to fill in the signature list in support of nomination of the candidate, the list of candidates at elections in bodies of the state power and bodies of local self-government? Access from the reference-legal system "ConsultantPlus" (Accessed 19.02.2025). (In Russ.)

6. Turishcheva N. Yu. Agitation in the Internet: in search of characteristics of a new environment. State and Law. 2020;(9):50–62. (In Russ.)

7. Astafichev P. A. Institution of people's representation in modern Russia. Orel; 2003. 292 р. (In Russ.)