Features of the emergence and development of domestic constitutionalism: on the 30th anniversary of the Constitution of the Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-7306-2023-1-4-102-108
EDN: EXXHIK
Abstract
The article examines the historical features of the emergence and development of domestic constitutionalism. The historical events and facts in which constitutionalism manifested itself most clearly are analyzed. The reasons for the fact that the Russian Constitution was not adopted in the monarchical period are indicated. The reasons for the events are explained. It is considered that the published constitution was first adopted during the republican period, despite the fact that during the monarchical period, prominent statesmen devoted a huge amount of time and effort to developing constitutional projects and even attempts were made to form a legal space for the subsequent adoption of the constitution. It is concluded that constitutionalism is immanent to the state power itself, even in the actual absence of a published constitution.
About the Authors
S. P. Fedorenko
South-Russia Institute of Management – branch of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Rostov Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Россия
Россия
Svyatoslav P. Fedorenko – Cand. Sci. (Jurid.), Associate Professor of the Department of Theory and History of Law and State; Associate Professor of the Department of Theory of State and Law
Rostov-on-Don
R. G. Nepranov
Rostov State University of Economics
Россия
Россия
Ruslan G. Nepranov – Cand. Sci. (Jurid.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Theory and History of State and Law
Rostov-on-Don
References
1. Karamzin N. M. The history of the Russian state: in 12 volumes. St. Petersburg: Type. N. Grecha, 1816–1829. (In Russ.)
2. Pugachev A. N. The meaning of the term «constitution». Bulletin of the Polotsk State University. Series D. Economic and legal sciences. 2011;(14):134–137. (In Russ.)
3. Petrukhin V. Ya. Rus in the IX–X centuries. From the vocation of the Varangians to the choice of faith. Monograph. (2nd edition, revised and expanded). Forum Publishing House. Moscow, 2014. (In Russ.)
4. Kondrakova N. N. Magna Carta – the fundamental constitutional act of England. Law and Society. 2012;4(4):30–31. (In Russ.)
5. Gippius A. A., Mikheev S. M. «Assassins of Grand Duke Andrew»: an inscription about the murder of Andrei Bogolyubsky from Pereslavl-Zalessky. Slověne. 2020;9(2):63–102. (In Russ.)
6. Karpichenko N. P. The Cathedral Code of 1649. Law and education. 2019;(8):152–158. (In Russ.)
7. Anthology on the history of state and law of the USSR (Pre-October period). Yu.P. Titov (ed.). Moscow: Legal Literature; 1990. 480 p. (In Russ.)
8. Klyuchevsky V. O. Works in 9 volumes. Vol. V. Moscow: Mysl; 1989. (In Russ.)
9. Klyuchevsky V. O. Works in 9 volumes. Vol. IV. Moscow: Mysl; 1989. (In Russ.)
10. Panov V. N. Russian absolutism of the XVIII century and alternative projects of political development. Priority areas for the development of science and education. 2016;1(8):42–48. (In Russ.)
11. Medushevsky A. N. Constitutional projects in Russia of the XVIII – early XX century. Moscow: Russian Political Encyclopedia; 2010. (In Russ.)
12. Karpenko O. A., Kalashnikova E. B. M.M. Speransky's progressive and current ideas on carrying out reforms of the system of state and legal structure. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2020;9-2(48):161–164. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Fedorenko S.P., Nepranov R.G. Features of the emergence and development of domestic constitutionalism: on the 30th anniversary of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. North Caucasus Legal Vestnik. 2023;(4):102-108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-7306-2023-1-4-102-108. EDN: EXXHIK
Views:
8
JATS XML
Email this article 