On the question of the essence of prejudicial facts as conditions limiting the activities of courts in the civil process in Russia
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-7306-2024-1-2-152-159
EDN: PSVPHE
Abstract
The article examines the conditions limiting the discretionary powers of courts in the civil process. The problem is established of the applicability by courts of prejudicial facts contained in judicial acts in a previously considered case in a new trial if they do not correspond to the internal convictions of the court. The relevance of the work lies in the special significance of the institution of prejudicial facts in the context of implementing legal certainty of the entire legal system of Russia. The purpose of the study is to analyze the current legislation of Russia in order to determine the essence of prejudicial facts as conditions limiting the activities of courts in the civil process in Russia. The subject of the study is the norms of procedural legislation regulating the application of prejudicial facts by courts, as well as the judicial practice of higher courts. By analyzing the norms of Russian legislation, it is concluded that prejudicial facts require a more detailed settlement, in particular, on issues related to the basis for releasing the court from the obligation to take into account the circumstances established in the course of a previously considered case.
About the Author
И. БухароваРоссия
Irina V. Bukharova - Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law Disciplines; Acting Head of the Department of Business Law, Civil and Arbitration Proceedings
Rostov-on-Don
References
1. Shatkovskaya T. V., Goncharov E. I. Electronic document management in the judicial system of the Russian Federation: problems and prospects. North Caucasus Legal Vestnik. 2021;(2):131-134. (In Russ.)
2. Amosov S. M. On the issue of free justice. State and law. 2020;(10):136-140. (In Russ.)
3. Andreeva T. K. On additional mechanisms to ensure uniformity of judicial and arbitration practice. Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. 2007;(7):72-75. (In Russ.)
4. Tarbagaeva E. B. Truthfulness, bias and legal force of a court decision. In: Problems of proof in criminal cases: Interuniversity collection of scientific papers. Krasnoyarsk; 1988:52-60. (In Russ.)
5. Iskanderov R. On the prejudicial significance of sentences. Soviet justice. 1990;(22):22-23. (In Russ.)
6. Kardanets A. V. Prejudice in Russian law (problems of theory and practice): abstract. say...cand. legal science N. Novgorod, 2002:18-22. (In Russ.)
7. Babaev V. K. Presumptions in Soviet law. Gorky, 1974:33–34. (In Russ.)
8. Kurylev S. V. Fundamentals of the theory of evidence in Soviet justice. Minsk: BSU Publishing House, 1969. 203 p. (In Russ.)
9. Lukyanova I. N. Problems of the institution of prejudice as an instrument of legal determination in modern civil proceedings. Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2015;(12):28-32. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
On the question of the essence of prejudicial facts as conditions limiting the activities of courts in the civil process in Russia. North Caucasus Legal Vestnik. 2024;(2):152-159. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-7306-2024-1-2-152-159. EDN: PSVPHE
JATS XML














