The state programs and initiatives to support traditional spiritual and moral values in the Russian Federation

Introduction. The state policy of the Russian Federation in the field of traditional spiritual and moral values is aimed at ensuring the sociocultural stability of society through support for the institution of the family, cultural heritage, and moral education. The effectiveness of this policy depends on a balanced combination of legislative regulation, resource support, and the creation of a favorable cultural and educational environment.

The purpose of this article is a comprehensive analysis of the role and mechanisms of state support for traditional spiritual and moral values in the Russian Federation. It examines the main functions of the state in this area, including legislative regulation, educational, cultural, and social initiatives, and also assesses the effectiveness of the tools used.

Methods. The study utilizes a combination of general and specific scientific methods. Specifically, institutional, systemic-structural, and functional approaches were employed to analyze the interactions between the state and public institutions (family, education, culture, and religious organizations). A formal-logical method was employed to analyze constitutional and sectoral legislation. Comparative analysis and statistical observation (quantitative and qualitative sociological data) were also employed to assess the implementation of federal and regional programs. The empirical base consists of federal laws, decrees of the President of the Russian Federation, federal projects (Demography, Education, and Culture), grant data, and the results of sociological surveys reflecting the dynamics of citizens' value attitudes. Particular attention is paid to methods for assessing the effectiveness of public policy in this area.

Results. The article demonstrates that the state implements a multifaceted policy, acting simultaneously as a guarantor of rights, a coordinator, a customer, and a regulator. Specific mechanisms are analyzed: legislative consolidation of the foundations of family policy, integration of educational programs into schooling, economic support for families, subsidizing cultural projects focused on traditional themes, and partnership with religious and public institutions. It is revealed that the central task is to transition from the directive transmission of values from above to creating conditions for their reproduction by society, family, educational, and cultural institutions. The need to improve the system for evaluating policy effectiveness, especially regarding measuring long-term educational effects, is noted.

Conclusions. The effectiveness of state policy in preserving and strengthening spiritual and moral values depends on institutional consistency and the flexibility of tools that allow adaptation to regional specifics. Promising areas for development include strengthening the role of independent expertise in program evaluation, expanding grant support for grassroots initiatives, and deeper involvement of culture and art in shaping the value landscape. Success depends on a balanced approach that combines material support with the creation of a favorable cultural and educational environment.

1. Mukhin M.I. Spiritual and moral education as the cornerstone of human personality formation. Perspectives of Science and Education. 2024;5(71):10–29. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2024.5.1. EDN: DEDGTC

2. Letova N.V. Motherhood and childhood as the basis of family policy: modernity and historical heritage. State and Law. 2023;(3):120–127. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S102694520024778-6. EDN: FDDJVK

3. Sokolov A.V., Turgaev A.S. Traditional values and book culture. Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2022; (7):116–128. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2022-7-116-128. EDN: NMCZYO

4. Kleymenov M.P., Seibol E.M. Freedom of conscience and national security. Russian Journal of Criminology. 2023;17(4):323–332. (In Russ.)

5. Kanukova Z.V. Traditional culture of the peoples of the North Caucasus in modern society. History, Arche-ology and Ethnography of the Caucasus. 2024;20(3):599–606. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32653/CH203599-606. EDN: XKLOPM

6. Mironov V.V. Information space: a challenge to culture. Information Society Journal. 2005;(1):31–35. (In Russ.). EDN: KVMGOB

7. Wallerstein I. Analysis of world systems and the situation in the modern world. Translated from English. St. Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga; 2001. 416 p. (In Russ.)

8. Razdolsky S.A. Problems and approaches in the theory and methodology of studying Adyghe culture. In: Socio-Humanitarian and Ecological Problems of the Development of Modern Adygea. Rostov-on-Don; 2012:209–222. (In Russ.)

9. Shatkin M.A., Orlov M.O. Ethnocultural tradition as heritage: reconceptualization in modern conditions. Russia and the Contemporary World. 2024;4(125):190–204. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31249/rsm/2024.04.12. EDN: IIVBWI

10. Levchenkov A.I., Glazkov V.A. The moral state: reality and prospects. State and Law. 2022;(4):13–20. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S102694520019553-9. EDN: KDXRNF

11. Girinsky A. A. On the conservative balance and traditional values. Russia in global politics. 2023; Vol. 21. (2(120)): P. 64–75. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6439-2023-21-2-64-75. EDN: JFZNJJ 12. Alekseev R.A. Main Vectors of the State Policy of the Russian Federation in Value-Program Normative Documents. Journal of political research. 2026;(1):3–16. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.12737/2587-6295-2026-10-1-3-16. EDN: DMQVQM