Preview

North Caucasus Legal Vestnik

Advanced search

Assessment of the effectiveness of the investigative units at the district level: from the complexity of the criminal case to the timing of its investigation

Abstract

Introduction. The article is devoted to the analysis of modern approaches to assessing the effectiveness of the investigative units of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation in the context of the categories of "complex" and "simple" criminal cases in relation to the timing of its investigation. According to the author of the study, the current system for evaluating the work of investigative units of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, established in accordance with the Order of the Deputy Minister – Head of the Investigative Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, Colonel-General of Justice Lebedev S.N. No. 1/8120 of July 19, 2021, does not seem objective and requires changes in terms of differentiating criminal cases into categories of "complex" and "simple" depending on the number of defendants, the number of episodes of criminal activity, the qualification of the crime, the procedural behavior of participants in criminal proceedings and other characteristics.

Purpose. Substantiation of the relationship between the effectiveness of the investigative units of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation and the complexity of the investigation of criminal cases under investigation and the timing of their investigation.

Methods. Empirical methods of comparison, description, interpretation; theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic. Private scientific methods: systematic, grammatical and logical interpretation. Special legal methods: formal legal. Mathematical methods: the method of mathematical induction, mathematical deduction, mathematical analysis. The theoretical basis of the study was made up of the works of Russian legal scholars, as well as the results of the study and analysis of 4,997 criminal indictments that were under investigation by investigators of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation.

Results. The lack of objectivity in assessing the activities of the investigative units of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, the failure to take into account the relationship between the complexity and procedural timing of the investigation of criminal cases, has been established. A direct relationship has been established between the characteristics of the criminal case (the number of defendants, the number of episodes of criminal activity, the qualification of the crime, and the procedural behavior of participants in criminal proceedings). with the terms of the investigation of the criminal case.

Conclusions. The current assessment of the effectiveness of the investigative units at the district level is biased and needs to be adjusted. Departmental assessment of the timing of the investigation of a criminal case does not always allow us to draw a conclusion about the effectiveness (inefficiency) of the work of the investigative unit of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation at the district level. Management decisions made based on an assessment of the activities of the investigative units of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation at the district level cannot be objective due to the imperfection of the relevant indicators.

About the Author

V. N. Zaitsev
Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; Karelian Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Vladislav N. Zaitsev – Associate Professor at the Academy of Management; Lecturer at the Department of Criminal Law and Procedure, Lieutenant Colonel of Justice

Moscow

Petrozavodsk



References

1. Ursul A.D., Zhuchenko A. A., Tarasov O. Yu. et al. The problem of effectiveness in modern science: (Methodological aspects). Ed. by A.D. Ursul. Chisinau: Stiinca; 1985. 256 p. (In Russ.)

2. Andriychuk V. G. Efficiency of agricultural enterprises: theory, methodology, analysis. Moscow: KNEU, 2013; 292 p. (In Russ.)

3. Kotarbinsky T. A treatise on good work. Edited by G. H. Popov. Moscow: Economics; 1975. 269 p. (In Russ.)

4. Alexandrov A. S. How not to be a preliminary investigation. State and law. 2001;(9):54–62. (In Russ.)

5. Golovko L. V. Police reform in the context of modernization of pre-trial proceedings in the Russian criminal process. In: Criminal justice: the connection of times / comp. A.V. Smirnov, K. B. Kalinovsky. Moscow: CJSC Aktion-Media; 2012:24–31. (In Russ.)

6. Zuev S. V. Information support of the criminal process: dis. ... Cand. Sci. (Law). Omsk; 2002. 207 p. (In Russ.)

7. Petrov M., Burov V., Shklyaruk M., Sharov A. The state as a platform. (Cyber)The state for the digital economy. Digital transformation. Moscow: Center for Strategic Research; 2018. 52 p. (In Russ.)

8. Mozhaeva I. P. Criminalistic teaching on the organization of crime investigation: abstract of the dissertation. ... Dr. Sci. (Law). Moscow; 2014. 54 p. (In Russ.)

9. Ashirbekova M. T., Kudin F. M. "Reasonable time" as an evaluative concept in criminal procedure law. Criminal proceedings. 2011;(2):21–25. (In Russ.)

10. Ashirbekova M. T. On the criminal procedural functions of the investigator. Law Bulletin of Samara University. 2019;5(4):81–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2019-5-4-81-85 (In Russ.)

11. Mikhailova I. A., Rytkova V. Yu. Some issues of crime qualification. Problems of law enforcement activity. 2017;(4):65–69. (In Russ.)

12. Baev O. Ya. Legal and tactical bases of discretion in criminal prosecution. Moscow: Yurlitinform; 2012. 232 p. (In Russ.)

13. Plaksina T. A. The social grounds of circumstances qualifying murder and their legal expression in the elements of a crime : a monograph; edited by V. D. Filimonov ; Federal Agency for Education, Altai State University. Barnaul : Publishing House of the Altai University, 2006 (Barnaul: Type. Azbuka LLC). 431 p. (In Russ.)

14. Pobegailo E. F. The crisis of modern Russian criminal policy. Criminal law. 2004;(4):112–117. (In Russ.)

15. Ivanov N. G. Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation "On judicial practice in cases of murder (art. 105 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). A critical look". Criminal Law. 2000;(2):21–25. (In Russ.)

16. Nikolaev K. D., Bavsun M. V. Problems of legal assessment against public safety associated with murder. Russian Justice. 2010;(1):31–34. (In Russ.)

17. Urban V. V. Reasonable time and effectiveness of criminal proceedings. Monograph. Moscow: Prospekt; 2020. 144 p. (In Russ.)

18. Toropov B. A., Urban V. V., Zaitsev V. N. and others. Optimization of the assessment of the activities of pre-trial investigation bodies, taking into account the actual staffing levels and the optimal load on investigative units. Analytical materials with proposals. Moscow: Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; 2024. 53 p. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Zaitsev V.N. Assessment of the effectiveness of the investigative units at the district level: from the complexity of the criminal case to the timing of its investigation. North Caucasus Legal Vestnik. 2025;(2):132-141. (In Russ.)

Views: 17

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2074-7306 (Print)
ISSN 2687-0304 (Online)