To the question of the relationship between the concepts of «jurisdiction», «cognizance» and «competence»
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-7306-2023-1-1-148-153
Abstract
The article analyzes the concepts of «jurisdiction», «cognizance» and «competence» on the basis of their relationship with each other, in connection with the amendments made to the regulatory legal acts. In points to different procedural consolidation and different understanding of these concepts in the texts of the law, which, according to the author, is unacceptable, and therefore, it is proposed to introduce appropriate changes to the current legislation.
About the Author
M. Yu. Petrova
Saratov State Law Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. Yu. Petrova – Postgraduate Student of the Department of Civil
Saratov
References
1. Actual problems of civil and administrative proceedings. V. V. Yarkov (ed). Moscow: Statut; 2011. 460 p. (In Russ.)
2. Osipov Yu. K. Jurisdiction of legal affairs. Sverdlovsk; 1973. 124 p. (In Russ.)
3. Argunov V. V. Breaking the legal foundations or ordinary elimination of another legal purism in judicial practice? Commentary on the Ruling of the Judicial Collegium for Economic Disputes of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated April 13, 2016 No. 306-ES15-14024. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii = Bulletin of Economic Justice of the Russian Federation. 2016;(8). (In Russ.)
4. Gurvich M. A. Right to claim. Moscow; Leningrad: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR; 1949. 216 p. (In Russ.)
5. Schweitzer D. V. Civil process and arbitration. Moscow, 1960. 56 p. (In Russ.)
6. Eliseikin P. F. Protection of subjective rights and interests and the competence of the court in civil proceedings. In: Scholarly notes of the Far Eastern State University. Vladivostok;1969. 120 p. (In Russ.)
7. Chudinovskikh K. A. Jurisdiction in the system of civil and arbitration procedural law. St. Petersburg; Legal Center Press, 2004. 306 p. (In Russ.)
8. Efimova Yu. V. Changing the concept of jurisdiction in modern civil proceedings. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii = Bulletin of the Saratov State Law Academy. 2019;(6):207–212. (In Russ.)
9. Efimova Yu. V. The system of jurisdiction in civil proceedings. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii = Bulletin of the Saratov State Law Academy. 2019;(4):265–268. (In Russ.)
10. Vaskovskiy E. V. Civil procedure course: Subjects and objects of the process, procedural relations and actions. Moscow: Statut; 2016. 624 p. (In Russ.)
11. Arbitration process: textbook. D. H. Valeev, M. Yu. Chelyshev (eds.). Moscow: Statut; 2010. 572 p. (In Russ.)
12. Konova F .R. The impact of the doctrine on the transformation of the concept of "competence of the court" in the context of reforming the civil procedural legislation. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Bulletin of the civil process. 2022;(1):127–157. (In Russ.)
13. Vasiliev D. P. Delimitation of competence between courts of general and arbitration jurisdiction. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii = Bulletin of the Saratov State Law Academy. 2018;2(121):164–170. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Petrova M.Yu. To the question of the relationship between the concepts of «jurisdiction», «cognizance» and «competence». North Caucasus Legal Vestnik. 2023;(1):148-153. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-7306-2023-1-1-148-153
Views:
3
JATS XML
Email this article 